Andreas Pflug wrote:

> Christopher Browne wrote:
>
>> I have checked in a fair "boatload" of patches supporting this and 
>> that; from my perspective, I think it starts making sense to look 
>> towards a 1.1 release in the next couple of weeks.
>
>
> IMHO at least partial win32 support would be nice.
> The issues I'm aware of are:
> - slony1_funcs works ok if linked using changed makefiles, patch was 
> posted.
> - slon needs minimal tweaking because a (portable) function needs to 
> be used to compare pthread_t datatypes. It doesn't link, which is a 
> makefile problem. Somebody else who's more experienced with makefiles 
> should do this.
> - slonik would need much more work; pgAdmin can replace it. Using as 
> few sql scripts to initially create a cluster would be helpful here 
> (to join an existing cluster, pgAdmin extracts schema and functions 
> from an existing node).

I have taken the material that Andreas posted back in February and added 
it to a "Win32" directory; that looks like all that can be offered as 
support at this point.

If someone can provide more meaningful Win32 support, then that would be 
nice.  This would requiree that a volunteer emerge who is prepared to 
take responsibility for making Slony-I components work on Win32.