Fri Mar 11 19:42:34 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Moving Towards Slony-I 1.1
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Moving Towards Slony-I 1.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christopher Browne wrote: > I have checked in a fair "boatload" of patches supporting this and that; > from my perspective, I think it starts making sense to look towards a > 1.1 release in the next couple of weeks. IMHO at least partial win32 support would be nice. The issues I'm aware of are: - slony1_funcs works ok if linked using changed makefiles, patch was posted. - slon needs minimal tweaking because a (portable) function needs to be used to compare pthread_t datatypes. It doesn't link, which is a makefile problem. Somebody else who's more experienced with makefiles should do this. - slonik would need much more work; pgAdmin can replace it. Using as few sql scripts to initially create a cluster would be helpful here (to join an existing cluster, pgAdmin extracts schema and functions from an existing node). Regards, Andreas
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Moving Towards Slony-I 1.1
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Moving Towards Slony-I 1.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list