>
> That's kind of like saying "I want a car, but I don't want it to have an
> engine because
> I'm never going to use the gas pedal".
>
> If you don't have paths, it won't work. Slony needs paths to know were to
> send that data.
> Likewise, it needs to know if the data got to the slaves, hence the
> "chatter".
>
>
Are you sure about that? I understood that you could get away with not
having paths between slaves, provided you had paths to and from each slave
and the master. The downside was that failover wouldn't work, but that's
acceptable for my purposes. Why pay for something I'm not using?

Thanks,
John
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20100505/1b5e3130/attachment.htm