>Can I simply not have paths between slaves, and avoid the performance 
penalty?

That's kind of like saying "I want a car, but I don't want it to have an engine because
I'm never going to use the gas pedal".

If you don't have paths, it won't work. Slony needs paths to know were to send that data.
Likewise, it needs to know if the data got to the slaves, hence the "chatter".

Melvin Davidson 


--- On Wed, 5/5/10, John Moran <johnfrederickmoran at gmail.com> wrote:

From: John Moran <johnfrederickmoran at gmail.com>
Subject: [Slony1-general] I don't want failover; Can I skip chatter between slaves?
To: slony1-general at lists.slony.info
Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2010, 4:52 PM

Hi,

I'm not interested in failover; it doesn't make sense for my domain.
I'd like to use Slony, without paying for the overhead of "chatter"
between slaves; they don't need to SYNC between each other, because
I'll never failover or switchover.

Can I simply not have paths between slaves, and avoid the performance penalty?

Thanks,
John Moran
_______________________________________________
Slony1-general mailing list
Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20100505/7c99e8a1/attachment.htm