Scott Marlowe scott.marlowe at gmail.com
Thu Jun 17 13:21:46 PDT 2010
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Vivek Gupta
>>> <vivek.gupta at globallogic.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We have upgrade the Slony from 1.1.5 to 2.0.4rc2 and additionally the
>>>> platform has been migrated from 32-bit to 64-bit. To our strange ‘slon’
>>>> process is taking ~250 MB of memory although its usage was in KBs
>>>> earlier.
>>>> What could be the root cause either slony upgrade or the platform
>>>> change?
>>>
>>> You'll find in general that the 64-bit OS will use much more RAM.
>>> Without knowing your OS and what the size was before it is hard to say
>>> for sure if this accounts for all of your increase.
>>
>> FYI, on 64 bit Centos 5.4 my slon daemons are using about 250k to 350k
>> resident (virt is about twice that).  When they are first restarted
>> they sit at ~200k VIRT and 3k RSS.
>
> Which version of slony 2.0.x or 1.2.x ?

1.2.15 or so.  (whatever version RHEL ships)  I'm gonna upgrade to
1.2.latest when I get my new servers in a few weeks.  Want to test
2.0.4 when it comes out, but haven't had the chance yet.  Last year I
had catastrophic failures of 2.0.2 or so under testing, and it took
weeks for the problems to show up.


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list