Steve Singer ssinger at ca.afilias.info
Thu Jun 17 13:16:10 PDT 2010
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Vivek Gupta
>> <vivek.gupta at globallogic.com> wrote:
>>> We have upgrade the Slony from 1.1.5 to 2.0.4rc2 and additionally the
>>> platform has been migrated from 32-bit to 64-bit. To our strange ‘slon’
>>> process is taking ~250 MB of memory although its usage was in KBs earlier.
>>> What could be the root cause either slony upgrade or the platform change?
>> You'll find in general that the 64-bit OS will use much more RAM.
>> Without knowing your OS and what the size was before it is hard to say
>> for sure if this accounts for all of your increase.
> 
> FYI, on 64 bit Centos 5.4 my slon daemons are using about 250k to 350k
> resident (virt is about twice that).  When they are first restarted
> they sit at ~200k VIRT and 3k RSS.

Which version of slony 2.0.x or 1.2.x ?


> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general


-- 
Steve Singer
Afilias Canada
Data Services Developer
416-673-1142


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list