Mon Apr 5 06:49:37 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg at sympatico.ca> wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Jaime Casanova wrote: > >>> Slony 2.0.x currently also supports 8.3. >> >> what about a 2.1.x version? :) > > Putting new features into 2.1.x over 2.0.x might make some sense. Do we > (the community of slony users) want to require 8.4+ for 2.1.x? I think that > is open for discussion. My initial thoughts are that we want to keep each > version of slony compatible with as many versions of Pg as possible both to > make upgrading Pg with slony easier and to make it easier for us to eol > slony versions. > well my main preocupation is to avoid developers to execute truncate, but maybe the answer is to revoke that privilege in 8.4 -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list