On Sun, 4 Apr 2010, Jaime Casanova wrote:

>> Slony 2.0.x currently also supports 8.3.
>
> what about a 2.1.x version? :)

Putting new features into 2.1.x over 2.0.x might make some sense.  Do we 
(the community of slony users) want to require 8.4+ for 2.1.x? I think that 
is open for discussion.  My initial thoughts are that we want to keep each 
version of slony compatible with as many versions of Pg as possible both 
to make upgrading Pg with slony easier and to make it easier for us to eol 
slony versions.

This also raises the question of what else people would like to see in 2.1.x

>
> -- 
> Atentamente,
> Jaime Casanova
> Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
> Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
> Guayaquil - Ecuador
> Cel. +59387171157
>
>