Fri Oct 10 02:03:52 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony Architecture
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony Architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim Hawes a écrit : > We currently have 6 slave nodes, 1 master. One of the slave nodes (slave > A) is being replicated over the WAN. > > On the LAN of that remote slave (slave A), are several other boxes I am > wanting to replicate to. I want these new slaves to replicate from slave > A, they do not need to know anything about the other 6 nodes + 1 master > on the other side of the WAN. > > I tried setting this up, and just defined the paths accordingly. > However, I run test_slony_state.pl in a cron to keep me posted if any > replication descrepencies occur. It always complains about the 6 nodes > not having the needed conninfo to the slaves of slave A, even though > they do not have paths to those instances. > > Am I handling this the best way? Can I make test_slony_state.pl happy? > Should I put the slaves of slave A in a seperate slony cluster making > slave A the master, or do I need to do logshipping to slave A to do what > I want? Hi, I never used test_slony_state.pl, but I can tell that design should work. How did you configure sl_path ? Regards, - -- Stéphane Schildknecht PostgreSQLFr - http://www.postgresql.fr Dalibo - http://www.dalibo.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI7xp4A+REPKWGI0ERAmztAKDLQSzHCDJBpZQ6BWtkp47CKHZ84ACg0xb8 gskqbRhnVhSgpCHSgxi9hJs= =XR0i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony Architecture
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Slony Architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list