Fri Mar 7 07:55:30 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] configure-replication.sh and SEQUENCES
- Next message: [Slony1-general] configure-replication.sh and SEQUENCES
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le Friday 07 March 2008, Christopher Browne a écrit : > Glyn Astill <glynastill at yahoo.co.uk> writes: > >> Slony release when main devs think it is time to do, and as you > >> said, > >> perltools are not maintain by core-dev. > >> I find them usefull for my first approach of slony and wish them to > >> keep > >> up-to-date, or *at least* to be sync with a specific release. So, > >> looking at > >> the slony 'roadmap', perhaps it can be better to push tools scripts > >> to > >> another place : a pgfoundry or a slony-tools-1.2.X.tar. > >> Then, it let 'mature users' get the core, and other users get the > >> contrib-tools wich are *sync* and released with slony versions. > >> > >> I prefer have to wget slony-1.2.13, slony-doc-1.2.13, > >> slony-tools-1.2.13 > >> archives, but be sure they work all together. Than getting one > >> package with > >> doc from 1.2.12, tools between 1.1 and 1.2.12 and core from 1.2.13. > >> > >> It can consolidate them by releasing each part singly (even if at > >> the same > >> time). > >> > >> Views ? > > > > I've never used the perl tools, partially out of laziness and > > partially out of not seeing the need. Instead I just write little > > slonik scripts. Do they really save much time? > > The original point of the "altperl" scripts was as something of a > crutch for people that were having a hard time wrapping their heads > around the slonik language. > > Over time, some of Afilias' staff has progressed from valuing the > altperl scripts to thinking them pointless because "slonik isn't that > hard to write." (I'm certainly in that camp, but I don't consider > myself terribly representative since I have written quite a lot of > code that generates slonik code! :-)) I agree with the altperl tools need. What about removing the tools from the main package (all tools, not only the perl) and putting them in a dedicated package ? I explain: what about the slony1.2.14 , slony2.0 ? the docs are going to be *fully* updated ? the tools too ? -- Cédric Villemain Administrateur de Base de Données Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53 http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080307/5420e81a/attachment-0001.pgp
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] configure-replication.sh and SEQUENCES
- Next message: [Slony1-general] configure-replication.sh and SEQUENCES
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list