Does anyone has any idea about it? I am looking for any Slony catalog table
differences that I couldnt find myself in this specific scenario.

-Shoaib

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir at gmail.com> wrote:

> While trying out different scenarios in Slony (ver 1.2.9) I came across
> the following:
>
> When I did a failover on a node and made it back online again without
> doing an uninstall or delete on it, I was still able to see it in the
> sl_node table with active status and this is why when I did a subscribe
> again for the failed node (without a delete) I didnt get any error through
> slonik and I could see the entry in sl_subscribe for the failed node but =
the
> replication was not working for this node.
>
> Now in the other scenario when I did a store node and store node (without
> subscribe) for a fresh node to a cluster I could see in the sl_node table
> having exactly the same kind of entry as the failed node in sl_node table.
>
> I will like to know how can I differentiate between a failed node and a
> recently added node (without subscriptions) from the slony catalog tables?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Shoaib Mir
> Fujitsu Australia Software Technology
> shoaibm at fast.fujistu.com.au
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080409/=
f84effe9/attachment.htm