Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 10:29 +0100, Cyril SCETBON wrote:
> 
>> I think it would be better to be able to modify SLON_DATA_FETCH_SIZE by 
>> using a parameter on the slon command line. For example, we got a lot of 
>> updates (400 per second) between far geographical sites. I had to modify 
>> this variable and to recompile the slon binary cause I didn't find 
>> another way until now.
> 
> Cyril,
> 
> Could you publish your performance results? That will help everybody to
> understand the benefit of this change.
Ok Simon. I'll make it as soon as I'll have time. Actually, I'm really 
busy :-(
> 
> Do you have results for a variety of settings? It may be that we just
> make a permanent change of the #DEFINEd value, rather than making it
> configurable.
No, just before and after making that change I think. I'll check.

Regards