Tue Nov 6 06:16:15 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] matching versions of Postgresql on both master and slave necessary?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] matching versions of Postgresql on both master and slave necessary?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I believe that the cross-version replication is possible. I have experience with 8.1 (master) and 8.2 (slave) replication, and it works fine. j. On Nov 6, 2007 1:38 PM, Geoffrey <lists at serioustechnology.com> wrote: > Is it absolutely necessary to have the same versions of Postgres on both > the master and slave? Point is, we are currently running 7.4.16 on the > machines I plan to replicate, but thought I'd go with the lastest 7.4 > version (18). My ignorant assumption is that if you're going to have a > mis-match in versions, it's best to have the slave newer then the master. > > -- > Until later, Geoffrey > > Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little > temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. > - Benjamin Franklin > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] matching versions of Postgresql on both master and slave necessary?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] matching versions of Postgresql on both master and slave necessary?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list