Mon Jun 4 15:43:00 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Do we need to stop the write activity during a slave initialization?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Do we need to stop the write activity during a slave initialization?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6/4/07, Dmitry Koterov <dmitry at koterov.ru> wrote: > Hello. > > Seems Slony sometimes tries to play an event created BEFORE the whole > copying process was started? > I have the following timing: > > 1) in 18:28:28 a row was added to the table tableName > 2) in 18:28:30 we have DEBUG2 remoteWorkerThread_1: Begin COPY of table > "public"."tableName" > 3) about 20 minutes later slony on the slave tried to replay an event (1) > and failed with "duplicate check" violation (because an element was already > present in the table thanks to COPY). > > So, seems we have to stop any write activity during the start of a COPY > process to avoid this. That certainly shouldn't happen. Do you have a detailed test case that allows this error to be re-produced? > P.S. > Not a single, but 2 slave machines were copied sequentially. The first one > copied and began to replicate successfully, but the second - failed with > described symphtoms. > Slony 1.2.9.
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Do we need to stop the write activity during a slave initialization?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Do we need to stop the write activity during a slave initialization?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list