Mon Sep 25 12:23:05 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 12:04:02PM -0700, Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > > Ok as a counter to this, what about people who use some form of package > management, do it's upgrade method, and wonder why now they've ended up with > a bloched replication system, because there was no embeded call to the > upgrade functions via slonik? Granted somone blindly doing upgrades in this > manner is asking for problems but in that case should we hand them the gun > with a round in the chamber and the safety off? I was assuming that package managers qualified as "experts". It's true they don't always, but that's no excuse to make the whole system more complicated for the plain case. At least, IMO. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca "The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying November. --H.W. Fowler
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony files in share
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list