Mon May 15 07:24:27 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Segfault with Slony 1.1.5 and PG 8.1.3 on x86_64
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Segfault with Slony 1.1.5 and PG 8.1.3 on x86_64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote: > Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > >On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:15:13AM +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote: > > > > > >Hrm. I'd still bet on data corruption. You might try walking > >through the table, getting all the data, in chunks, and see if you > >get a failure. > > > I just did a "pg_dump -F p"of that table alone in one fell swoop, and it > worked perfectly; it's left me a nice Running vacuum on the table is better exercise, since the problem could be in one of the indexes. I think it's also got some sanity checking code that's not used by some other things. If this is PostgreSQL core dumping and not Slony, it'd also be a good idea to ask for help on one of the pgsql lists. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby at pervasive.com Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Segfault with Slony 1.1.5 and PG 8.1.3 on x86_64
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Segfault with Slony 1.1.5 and PG 8.1.3 on x86_64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list