Mon Mar 13 03:44:38 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] large object support
- Next message: [Slony1-general] recommended version (postgres)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:57:21PM -0600, David Durham wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> >No. That's what the problem is: it can't, because the lo_ functions
> >use OIDs as keys, and no triggers would fire.
>
> Actually, just to be sure, can a trigger on a (non-oid) column cause
> replication of the large object (whose oid is in the row) and then
> replication of the entire row?
No. The way the lo_ stuff works, the function puts a reference to an
oid in the pg_largeobject table. So the trigger would indeed fire,
but you still wouldn't get the large object copied, because you can't
put a trigger on pg_largeobject.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs at crankycanuck.ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] large object support
- Next message: [Slony1-general] recommended version (postgres)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list