> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 15:36 -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> Also, can the CMD folks comment on what kind of timetable is
>> >> reasonable to do the move?
>> >
>> > We can have a server up fairly quick... as soon as I can get off my
>> > hill
>> > (snowed in).
>>
>> So if we as a community decide on a December 15 date to finish the
>> move, would that be reasonable?  Assuming that the massaging of the
>> bug tickets into whatever new system would be  doable in that time.
>
> Yes. I could have the server installed early next week.

That would be super.

>> And if you're using trac internally, I vote we use trac for this
>> project too :-)
>
> We use Trac for all customer and CMD projects. Trac however does have
> it's downsides. Namely it is not designed for *sign up*. Which means
> that you either allow anonymous tickets (and thus spamming), you only
> allow specific people to submit tickets, or we develop a signup system.
>
> A signup system, honestly is about 1 full day worth of work, so it is
> completely doable and does give us the wonderful interface to SVN + the
> wiki.
>
> I setup bugzilla because the latest versions (I don't even know if it is
> actually officially released) will work with CVS. Bugzilla is designed
> to work with *large* projects. Trac is not.
>
> They are different products and they really should each be evaluated on
> their own merits.

Regrettably, this seems to make the choice a bit more complex, as opposed
to easier :-(.

Although the signup issue is making me bias towards Bugzilla...