Rod Taylor pg
Wed Feb 23 21:36:42 PST 2005
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 00:40 -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> We know that if there are old idle-in-transaction transactions lying
> around, we won't get any useful results out of a VACUUM.
> 
> A thought, therefore, is that the cleanup thread might take a peek to
> see if there is such a transaction that has been running since the
> _last_ cleanup cycle.  If that is the case, there's no point to
> VACUUMing any of the Slony-I tables as NONE of the tuples killed since
> the last cycle will get cleaned out.  It would be a good idea to
> report this in the log, perhaps even reporting an "offending" PID.

Skip the reporting (or make it optional). It's probably a pg_dump run or
something.


-- 



More information about the Slony1-general mailing list