Rod Taylor wrote:
> I've not looked at the source code, but wish to know the amount of
> effort required to make Slony function with PostgreSQL 7.2 as a master,
> 7.4 as the slave.
> 
> I presume 7.3 is a requirement due to Schema support and I would need to
> work around that only?

Yes, the schema support is essential here. Unfortunately the DOT between 
the schema name and the rest of the identifiers is hardcoded in so many 
places that I think the effort required will not be small. If 7.2 
support is not dramatically time critical, I think we can do something 
for the Slony 1.1 release.


Jan

-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck at Yahoo.com #