Mon Sep 8 07:42:37 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Slony 1.2.14 & PG 8.4devel
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] Slony 1.2.14 & PG 8.4devel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim at gunduz.org> writes: > I know it is a bit early for 8.4 changes... But just got this while > trying to compile Slony-I against today's PG CVS snapshot: > > make[1]: Entering directory `/var/lib/pgsql/rpm/BUILD/slony1-1.2.14' > make[2]: Entering directory `/var/lib/pgsql/rpm/BUILD/slony1-1.2.14/src' > make[3]: Entering directory `/var/lib/pgsql/rpm/BUILD/slony1-1.2.14/src/xxid' > gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -I/usr/include/et -I/usr/include -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -fpic -I../.. -I/usr/include/ -I/usr/include/pgsql/server/ -I/usr/include/ -I/usr/include/pgsql/server/ -I/usr/include/ -I/usr/include/pgsql/server/ -I/usr/include/et -I/usr/include -c -o xxid.o xxid.c > xxid.c: In function '_Slony_I_getMinXid': > xxid.c:236: error: 'SerializableSnapshot' undeclared (first use in this function) > xxid.c:236: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > xxid.c:236: error: for each function it appears in.) > xxid.c: In function '_Slony_I_getMaxXid': > xxid.c:249: error: 'SerializableSnapshot' undeclared (first use in this function) > make[3]: *** [xxid.o] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/lib/pgsql/rpm/BUILD/slony1-1.2.14/src/xxid' > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/lib/pgsql/rpm/BUILD/slony1-1.2.14/src' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/lib/pgsql/rpm/BUILD/slony1-1.2.14' > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.75223 (%build) > > FYI. Yes, this has been observed... The following bug may indicate an earlier form of the problem. http://bugs.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 We'd put off the issue pending the stabilizing of the matter in 8.4. e.g. - if there are about to be *MORE* changes to this, there's no point in fixing something that will just break again, particularly when 8.4 isn't released. Has the API stabilized? If it has, then we should be in a position to address the problem. If not, then I'm inclined to wait a bit more... -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxdatabases.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; http://cbbrowne.com/info/advocacy.html MICROS~1: Where do you want to go today? Linux: Been there, done that.
- Previous message: [Slony1-hackers] Slony 1.2.14 & PG 8.4devel
- Next message: [Slony1-hackers] Slony 1.2.14 & PG 8.4devel
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-hackers mailing list