<br>Hi Melvin,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody><tr><td style="font-family: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-size: inherit; line-height: inherit; font-size-adjust: inherit; font-stretch: inherit;" valign="top"><div class="im">
<br></div>Ah! That is not what you originally stated. Your original query was understood to mean to not have _any_ paths. Yes, if you define the path(s) from master to slave(s), then it will work. Although I personally don;t see the benefit, unless you are talking about _many_ slaves.</td>
</tr></tbody></table></blockquote><div><br>The benefit is that I don't have to maintain paths, nor do I pay any overhead for a feature I am absolutely certain I will never use.<br><br>Regards,<br>John<br></div></div><br>