On 07/25/2015 12:31 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> While in the best of all possible worlds, we'd have planned out a
> replication strategy before we get tables whose initial sync via
> "SUBSCRIBE SET" will never finish, we aren't always given that much
> ability to plan that soon.

One thing I forgot to ask initially. What do you mean by "will never 
finish"? Is that just being facetious about "it will take a long time", 
is it that you don't have the disk storage to swallow the back log that 
will accumulate or is it "outdated knowledge" from the times when Slony 
did actually slow down with accumulation of backlog?


Regards, Jan

-- 
Jan Wieck
Senior Software Engineer
http://slony.info