Folks,

This came up in the context of making slony k-safe for some k>0.

Naively, a simple way to do this would be to have >1 machine, each
running all the slons for a cluster, replacing any machines that fail.

Would Bad Things™ happen as a consequence?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david at fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter at gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate