The development package postgresql92-devel-9.2.6-1PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm and
postgresql93-devel-9.3.2-1PGDG.rhel5.x86_64.rpm at
http://yum.postgresql.org/rpmchart.php

also has the port.h in the server include.

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Sandeep Thakkar <
sandeep.thakkar at enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> I see the port.h also present in the postgresql-server-dev package. Here
> is the list:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/i386/postgresql-server-dev-9.3/filelist
>
> if you build the sources, you will find port.h always in server include.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:28 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info>wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/2013 05:14 AM, Sandeep Thakkar wrote:
>>
>>> How did you install postgresql on Debian? I have built PosrgreSQL
>>> sources on CentOS, OSX and Windows and the port.h is installed in
>>> include/postgresql/server/port.h and include/postgresql/internal/port.h
>>> on all platforms.
>>>
>>
>>
>> The packages from apt.postgresql.org
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info
>>> <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On 11/29/2013 04:30 AM, Sandeep Thakkar wrote:
>>>
>>>         The only work around I see now if to set the CPPFLAGS in the
>>>         environment
>>>         to the server include directory, so that CPPFLAGS_CLIENT takes
>>>         it in the
>>>         Makefile.global.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     So in debian (or at least with Wheezy) where the original bug 315
>>>     was reported
>>>
>>>
>>>     libpq-dev puts port.h in /usr/include/postgresql/port.h so it gets
>>>     picked up by the client include paths.  I am able to do a build with
>>>     --with-pgport
>>>
>>>     This isn't actually a problem on debian, is the problem on OSX that
>>>     port.h isn't being put in the libpq header directories?  Should it?
>>>     Where do other platforms/distributions put port.h ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Steve Singer
>>>         <ssinger at ca.afilias.info <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>
>>>         <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.__info
>>>
>>>         <mailto:ssinger at ca.afilias.info>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>              On 11/26/2013 04:14 AM, Sandeep Thakkar wrote:
>>>
>>>                  Hi
>>>
>>>                  I was building Slony1-2.2.1 sources on Mac OS X and
>>>         found that
>>>                  the build
>>>                  fails because of:
>>>
>>>                  slonik.c:49:18: error: port.h: No such file or directory
>>>                  CPPFLAGS is now defined to just CPPFLAGS_CLIENT that
>>>         does not
>>>                  include
>>>                  the PG "server" include directory
>>>                  ('<pginstall>/include/____postgresql/server' contains
>>>
>>>         port.h). Any
>>>
>>>                  specific
>>>                  reason why this change was made in 2.2.1?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         http://www.slony.info/____bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315
>>>         <http://www.slony.info/__bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315>
>>>
>>>
>>>              <http://www.slony.info/__bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315
>>>         <http://www.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=315>>
>>>
>>>              On systems that have multiple versions of postgresql
>>>         installed might
>>>              pull in files for the client from one version and server
>>>         includes
>>>              from another.  You used to be able to get away with this
>>>         but in more
>>>              recent versions of PG this breaks things.
>>>
>>>              I am not exactly sure what the best way to deal with this
>>>         in the
>>>              PGPORT case? I have a feeling just adding the server
>>>         includes back
>>>              in on --with-pgport builds will get us back to the bug 315
>>>         situation
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                  --
>>>                  Sandeep Thakkar
>>>
>>>
>>>                  ___________________________________________________
>>>                  Slony1-general mailing list
>>>                  Slony1-general at lists.slony.____info
>>>                  <mailto:Slony1-general at lists.__slony.info
>>>         <mailto:Slony1-general at lists.slony.info>>
>>>         http://lists.slony.info/____mailman/listinfo/slony1-____general
>>>         <http://lists.slony.info/__mailman/listinfo/slony1-__general>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         <http://lists.slony.info/__mailman/listinfo/slony1-__general
>>>         <http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         --
>>>         Sandeep Thakkar
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sandeep Thakkar
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sandeep Thakkar
>
>


-- 
Sandeep Thakkar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20131212/8848a560/attachment-0001.htm