On 12-12-04 11:50 PM, David Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Steve Singer <steve at ssinger.info> wrote:


>
> For example, table 1 is in set 1 and table 2 is in set 2 and table 1
> has a foreign key that refers to table 2.
>
> Changes that occur on the origin node 1 which will be the same for set
> 1/2 will obviously be fine, but is it possible for an event to be
> committed out-of-order on node 2?
>

If you subscribe  set 2 first, then set 1 and if both set 1 and your not 
using a different forwarder node, then I think you should be okay.


> Thank you!
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general
>