Glyn Astill glynastill at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Sep 8 09:14:00 PDT 2011



> From: Vick Khera <vivek at khera.org>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Glyn Astill <glynastill at yahoo.co.uk> 
> wrote:
>>> Slony 1.2 and 2.0 both behave this way, this shouldn't be new 
>>> behaviour with 2.0.
>>> 
>> 
>>  Hmm, my nagios graphs disagree (or for some reason were oblivious), we 
> check syncs every 10 minutes and they only started showing warnings the night 
> after we moved to 2.0. The check is basically just looks at sl_status, and flags 
> up a problem if st_lag_num_events or st_lag_time go over a threshold via the 
> following query.
>> 
> 
> I disagree as well.  We still run 1.2.x and I never get replication
> lag alarms from our monitoring, and the nightly dump of my big DB
> takes a couple of hours.  I'm still going to add the --exclude-schema
> to it, just because it is useless to dump the slony schema anyway.

Great to hear I'm not the only one then Vick.

When we were on 1.2 I purposefully used to dump the slony schema so that we could restore from our subscribers data and use slony baremetal functions to fix the schema corruption automatically.


More information about the Slony1-general mailing list