On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6925 at yahoo.com>wrote:

> >OK, same thing happened: disk usage on the Slony slave is now 96%, and
> >this is while COPY of our large table (over 45 GB in size) is running.
>  > 106 GB is used on disk.
>
> >Any suggestions, please?
>
> Is WAL archiving enabled on the slave? If so, turn it off, restart
> postgresql on the slave, then try replicating.
>

Thanks, Melvin.  WAL archiving is disabled on both servers.  (archive_mode =
off).

How much disk space should I expect Postgres (8.4.4) to use when receiving a
45 GB table via Slony?

Best,
Aleksey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20110213/fc885960/attachment.htm