Tue Feb 8 15:34:02 PST 2011
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How sensible is turning off synchronous_commiton a Slony slave while leaving it on on the master?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] How sensible is turning off synchronous_commiton a Slony slave while leaving it on on the master?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:52:52PM +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > Sadly, the number of users with <8.4 are really much bigger than the > number of users with 8.4. I don't find this sad. I find this an indication that people have things important to them in Postgres databases, and that they're naturally conservative about touching those things. It's a kind of victory when you have an installed base. (It's also a scourge, of course, but let's celebrate!) A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs at crankycanuck.ca
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] How sensible is turning off synchronous_commiton a Slony slave while leaving it on on the master?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] How sensible is turning off synchronous_commiton a Slony slave while leaving it on on the master?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list