Hi,

On 12/09/2011 11:58 AM, Steve Singer wrote:
> On 11-11-23 04:09 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
>
> Maxim,
>
> Did you ever check to see if this patch actually fixes your problem with
> running Slony against 9.1.x?
>
> Did you encounter any other issues with it?

I can't speak to Maxim's specific issue, but I can attest that the patch 
did resolve a problem I was having trying to replicate a large 9.1.1 
database using Slony 2.0.7.  Because the origin was being heavily used 
at the same time that the subscribe set operation was running, the 
initial copy failed repeatedly since the origin kept running out of 
predicate locks.  Changing the transaction isolation level from 
serializable to read committed allowed the copy to succeed.

So, for what it's worth, here's my +1 for including the patch.

Regards,

Galen
-- 
Galen Charlton
Director of Support and Implementation
Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
email:  gmc at esilibrary.com
direct: +1 770-709-5581
cell:   +1 404-984-4366
skype:  gmcharlt
web:    http://www.esilibrary.com/
Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & 
http://evergreen-ils.org