On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 06:00:56PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:

> Seeing as how nobody has really tried to think through the
> implications of the change, it's not obvious that this is something we
> ought to be doing in any already existing branch of Slony.  I'd not be
> too keen to "quickly shove it through" on 2.0, or even the
> hopefully-forthcoming-in-not-too-long 2.1.

Let me say more emphatically that I think it would be a terrible idea
to try to do this quickly.  I seem to recall there was a reason we
picked name rather than text in the distant past, but I have no clue
any more what it was.  Nevertheless, I'd be pretty reluctant to do
this in a hurry.  I hope the OP is doing this on a copy and not in
production!

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at crankycanuck.ca