On 10-09-23 10:27 AM, Benjamin Pineau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:46:00AM -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
>>
>> 1. You were running 2.0.4 before the upgrade as well
>> 2. The slony binaries your running with on 9.0 were compiled against
>> 9.0.  In particular the slony shared library
>
> By the way, is Slony 2.0.4 ready for/working with PostgreSQL 9.0 as is?
>
> I noticed there's no "src/backend/slony1_funcs.v90.sql" and
> "slony1_base.v90.sql" yet, even on git master's head ; but this should
> be mostly harmless, right?
>
> (sorry for sneacking in this unrelated thread - I'm also looking at
> migrations options, but preferably using slony ;).
>

2.0.4 should work with 9.0.  A decent amount of the testing I did in 
getting ready for 2.0.5 was against beta version of 9.0 (and I don't see 
any fixes for 9.0 stuff that went into 2.0.5 above what was already in 
2.0.4).  The 8.4 version of the backend functions seem to work okay
on 9.0.

But please report any problems you encounter.