Jeff Frost wrote:
> Would you consider slony1-2.0.4 as ready for production use?  i recall a thread from December indicating that 2.0.3 was not ready for production use.
> 

We hope to be able to tag a release candidate for 2.0.5 sometime next 
week.  We plan on giving  2.0.5 (once it is released) a thumbs up for 
production use internally.

During the past few months we have done a fair amount testing of slony 
and review of old bugs.  The release notes in progress for 2.0.5 
(http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=slony1-engine.git;a=blob;f=RELEASE;h=ee95676bb946a9310e189d99ba3828763e1542fd;hb=d747d9c97beeace62a1798e9b81807ca5727de3c)
should give you a sense of what we have fixed since 2.0.4 and that 
should help you make a decision on if you can live with 2.0.4 for your 
purposes.  A lot of the issues listed aren't unique to 2.0.x but are 
also present in 1.2.x if you where to look for them.

I'm going to encourage you (and others) to find some time to do your own 
testing of the release candidate.

Hope that helps.



> ---
> Jeff Frost <jeff at pgexperts.com>
> CTO, PostgreSQL Experts, Inc.
> Phone: 1-888-PG-EXPRT x506
> FAX: 415-762-5122
> http://www.pgexperts.com/ 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Slony1-general mailing list
> Slony1-general at lists.slony.info
> http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general


-- 
Steve Singer
Afilias Canada
Data Services Developer
416-673-1142