Wed Sep 1 06:44:58 PDT 2010
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony1-2.0.x ready for production?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
dba at richyen.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just wanted to look for an explanation regarding what happens on the > subscriber's end of a replication set. I currently have 4 nodes (1 thru > 4), and node 4 also has the "-a <dir>" flag turned on for log shipping (but > I think this is irrelevant) > > Occasionally, I will see in test_slony_state_dbi.pl, that one of the > subscribers has really old events or that the provider is lagging behind > the provider, so I decided to harvest some data. Wrote up a cronjob that > will fetch the average slony lag on node 4 (I could've picked any of them, > but just chose this one because load was lowest). > > > Using Slony 2.0.3, postgres 8.4.2 on CentOS 2.6.18 on all nodes. 1. You should upgrade right away to 2.0.4. Slony 2.0.3 has a rather serious memory corruption bug. (the bug was not present in 2.0.2). 2. What you describe sounds like bug 127 (http://bugs.slony.info/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127) which is present in any recent 1.2.x version and in all currently released 2.0.x versions but has been fixed in git and is planned to be included in 2.0.5 > > Much appreciated! > --Richard > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general -- Steve Singer Afilias Canada Data Services Developer 416-673-1142
- Next message: [Slony1-general] slony1-2.0.x ready for production?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list