Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info 

> One of our customers is looking to deploy this in an almost unattended 
> environment, and having memory leaks in Slon will most definitely hurt 
> their ability to deploy it with confidence.
> 
> I would prefer to see the patch incorporated in 2.0.4 and have people 
> test the RC1 than have it included after 2.0.4 in the hopes that people 
> would test the CVS version.

What do others think?

I take it your offering to give the leak memory hanges a good workout 
before we tag 2.0.4 final?


(A version of 2.0.4 RC1 + these changes can be found at 
http://github.com/ssinger/slony/tree/203_memfixes_UlrichWeber)



> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> gurjeet.singh
> @ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
> http://www.EnterpriseDB.com
> 
> singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | yahoo }.com
> Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet
> 
> Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device


-- 
Steve Singer
Afilias Canada
Data Services Developer
416-673-1142