Thu Jun 10 05:59:49 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] huge virtual memory size of slony1 proccess
- Next message: [Slony1-general] huge virtual memory size of slony1 proccess
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexander V Openkin wrote: > i build slony1-1.2.21 RPM for the i686 architecture with > postgresql8.4-server-8.4.4, > create test vps with the same linux distributive (but i686 arch..) > > It's amazing but, the same test db... > > [root at vps999 /]# ps auxf |grep slon > root 15397 0.0 0.0 1880 524 pts/0 S+ 07:58 0:00 \_ > grep slon > postgres 26415 0.0 0.0 5304 1376 pts/0 S 07:50 0:00 > /usr/bin/slon > postgres 26417 0.0 0.0 46448 1296 pts/0 Sl 07:50 0:00 \_ > /usr/bin/slon > [root at vps999 /]# > > VMZ 46mb.... it's wonderful > > > another experiment... > > slony1-1.2.21 with postgresql8.4-server-8.4.4 on the x86_64 vps, > the same linux distributive, the same test Db, 1 schema about 10 tables, > the same slon config > > [root at vps9999 /]# ps auxf |grep slon > root 9912 0.0 0.0 6040 584 pts/0 S+ 11:41 0:00 \_ > grep slon > postgres 7893 0.0 0.0 40640 1840 ? S 11:39 0:00 > /usr/bin/slon > postgres 7897 0.0 0.0 4108420 1500 ? Sl 11:39 0:00 \_ > /usr/bin/slon > [root at vps9999 /]# > > The same huge VMZ segment 4G... > i have ho idea where the bug... > Can you do the same test on a x86_64 server that isn't vps? On my x86_64 laptop with my test cluster of a non-optimized build (after slon has been running for a bit) I see (with 2.0.4) ssinger.local at ssinger:~/src/clustertest/clustertest$ ps auxf |grep bin/slon 994 15851 0.0 0.0 7336 868 pts/0 S+ 08:54 0:00 | \_ grep bin/slon 9994 7845 0.0 0.0 10700 144 pts/0 S Jun09 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql84/bin/slon -d4 disorder_replica dbname=test2 host=localhost user=slony password=slony 9994 9023 0.0 0.0 196016 1452 pts/0 Sl Jun09 0:03 \_ /usr/local/pgsql84/bin/slon -d4 disorder_replica dbname=test2 host=localhost user=slony password=slony x86_64 will tend to give a bit bigger memory footprint due to the larger pointer size. I am wondering if the 4GB your seeing is somehow vps related. > > > > 10.06.2010 10:32, Alexander V Openkin пишет: -- Steve Singer Afilias Canada Data Services Developer 416-673-1142
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] huge virtual memory size of slony1 proccess
- Next message: [Slony1-general] huge virtual memory size of slony1 proccess
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list