On 5/28/2010 6:57 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
> Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Steve Singer <ssinger at ca.afilias.info 
> 
>> One of our customers is looking to deploy this in an almost unattended 
>> environment, and having memory leaks in Slon will most definitely hurt 
>> their ability to deploy it with confidence.
>> 
>> I would prefer to see the patch incorporated in 2.0.4 and have people 
>> test the RC1 than have it included after 2.0.4 in the hopes that people 
>> would test the CVS version.
> 
> What do others think?
> 
> I take it your offering to give the leak memory hanges a good workout 
> before we tag 2.0.4 final?
> 
> 
> (A version of 2.0.4 RC1 + these changes can be found at 
> http://github.com/ssinger/slony/tree/203_memfixes_UlrichWeber)

Is that the memory leak from not freeing notifications? If so, let's 
test it with bombarding a slon with a gazillion notifies and if it 
survives, put it into 2.0.4.


Jan

-- 
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither
liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin