Thu Feb 4 18:02:08 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Any reason not to have 2 replication slaves, replicating to the same query slave
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Any reason not to have 2 replication slaves, replicating to the same query slave
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:39:03PM -0800, Tory M Blue wrote: > Slon 1.2.20 (For now as I migrate to 8.4 ) > > Just working out a new Slon setup, with a cascade configuration. > > ! master talking to 2 Slaves (if not more), that talk to 2-3 Qslaves. > > Is it wrong to have both Slaves talking, replicating to both QSlaves? When you say "replicating to", do you mean they're both actively sending data to the other replicas? If so, then it won't work. Only one can be the set origin for a given target at a time. But they can both be forwarders, such that one could take over for the other. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs at crankycanuck.ca
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Any reason not to have 2 replication slaves, replicating to the same query slave
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Any reason not to have 2 replication slaves, replicating to the same query slave
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list