Fri Aug 20 13:35:17 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Replicate to different table name
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_nodelock worries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I just found a case where Slony was refusing to startup because of entries in the sl_nodelock table. Further investigation showed that an entry in sl_nodelock.nl_backendpid matched up to a *non* Slony backend[1] in Postgres (definitely non-Slony as it was an application level username and not 'postgres') Is Slony relying solely on the pid number here? I'm guessing that something killed Slony, and then some other process used that pid and was holding on to it when Slony was attempted to restart (which was a few hours later). Any other theories of what might have happened? -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 163 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20100820/7ad810ae/attachment.pgp
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Replicate to different table name
- Next message: [Slony1-general] sl_nodelock worries
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list