Sun Apr 4 09:02:17 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Guillaume Lelarge wrote: > > Well, the limitation was understandable when PostgreSQL didn't have > TRUNCATE trigger. Now that it has (8.4 new capacity), it should probably > get added to Slony. Slony 2.0.x currently also supports 8.3. Is the thinking that if you compile against 8.4 truncate commands would be replicated but if your against 8.3 they won't by virtue of the trigger not firing? I see some appeal to this but supporting different feature sets against different pg versions does make maintenance/testing a bit more difficult going forward. Steve > > > -- > Guillaume. > http://www.postgresqlfr.org > http://dalibo.com > _______________________________________________ > Slony1-general mailing list > Slony1-general at lists.slony.info > http://lists.slony.info/mailman/listinfo/slony1-general > >
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list