Fri Apr 2 19:59:10 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Le 03/04/2010 04:56, Melvin Davidson a écrit : >> Well, the limitation was understandable when PostgreSQL didn't have >> TRUNCATE > trigger. Now that it has (8.4 new capacity), it should probably >> get > added to Slony. > > Ah, but you are working with slony (>= 1.2.17). To be compatible with all PostgreSQL versions _below_ 8.4, it cannot be implemented. So perhaps you might request it be added to Slony 2.0 which works with 8.4 and above. > Sure. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list