Fri Apr 2 18:50:20 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>why slony (>= 1.2.17) is not creating (when possible) a TRUNCATE >trigger to manage that situation? or there is another technique you >are using? In section 1.5 Current Limitations of the slony documentation, it specifically states that slony cannot generate a truncate trigger. So for replicated tables, it is either best to use a DELETE statement (can take a long time) or manually truncate the specific table in the master and slave. One workaround would be to use a SLONIK EXECUTE SCRIPT to propagate the TRUNCATE to all slaves. Melvin Davidson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20100402/661a8a1e/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Next message: [Slony1-general] truncating a table that is in a set
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list