Thu Apr 23 12:53:47 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] will truncating a table on the master be properly handled by slony on the slave?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] will truncating a table on the master be properly handled by slony on the slave?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 03:43:14PM -0400, Geoffrey wrote: >> drop the table > >>From the set. > create a new set > >> add it to a new set > > let the set be caught up everywhere > >> merge that set into the original set that table was in > > Yes. This step is optional. If you're going to truncate this again, > just don't merge. That is a good point, create a separate set for these tables moving forward. -- Until later, Geoffrey Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Benjamin Franklin
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] will truncating a table on the master be properly handled by slony on the slave?
- Next message: [Slony1-general] will truncating a table on the master be properly handled by slony on the slave?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list