cbbrowne <cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info> writes:
> Consistency would suggest either:
> a) Changing slonik to make it support the "richer" set of names, or
> b) Changing functions that manipulate cluster names to complain if the
> cluster name isn't supposed to be valid...

Grr.  Neither of these can work, as generating the cluster name
doesn't take place inside a function.

I could, in principle, add in a function that would be called by
several of the "front line" Slony-I config functions (I'd think that
those that stand behind STORE NODE would be pretty suitable) that
would complain bitterly if an invalid name was used.  

That feels mean-spirited, though ;-).
-- 
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "linuxfinances.info")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/linux.html
Rules of the Evil  Overlord #99. "Any data  file of crucial importance
will be padded to 1.45Mb in size." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>