Thu Oct 2 11:02:50 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Replication between different versions of pgsql
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Replication between different versions of pgsql
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcin Kasperski <Marcin.Kasperski at softax.com.pl> writes: > Anoop Bhat <ABhat at trustwave.com> writes: > >> Centos 5 only comes with 8.1.11 and as a company, we've decided that >> we'll go with whatever the distro comes with. Makes things easier >> for management etc. > > You must compile the same Slony version on both hosts, so at least > here you will be forced to lessen this rule. > > I succesfully Slony-migrated from 8.1 to 8.3. Don't know about 7.4 We've migrated 7.4 to 8.1; that interoperability has certainly been one of OUR requirements :-). In view that there will be a need to compile Slony-I in both environments, that certainly undermines the "whatever the distro comes with" argument, at least in part. I can't see why someone would be keen of keeping on a release that was obsoleted nearly two years ago (e.g. - 8.2 was released in December 2006), when there exist some quantity of data-eating bugs between 8.1 and 8.3 that will NEVER be addressed in the 8.1 release. -- output = reverse("moc.enworbbc" "@" "enworbbc") http://linuxdatabases.info/info/linuxxian.html Rules of the Evil Overlord #111. "I will offer oracles the choice of working exclusively for me or being executed." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Re: Replication between different versions of pgsql
- Next message: [Slony1-general] Replication between different versions of pgsql
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list