On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 19:57 +0900, Stephane LAPIE wrote:

> Oh, yes, I forgot mentioning, I already run a slon daemon on each server.
> 
> As for the splitting, wouldn't having the processing done on two 
> servers, and with only two separate data sets (each server being master 
> for one data set) do the same? 

Not sure, check from logs, which daemon does the actual data updating.

I have not been running slony for quite a long time. I last used it at
Skype a few years ago before we moved to our own implementation -
Londiste/pgQ from SkyTools. The main reason was that our cluster got too
big to manage with slony.

> I noticed that for two data sets 
> originating from different servers, the set with virtually no 
> replication load compared to the other fared pretty well.

-------------
Hannu