Hi,


Here are the plots of several metrics taken with the original slon =

binary (25 september 2007) and with the new slon binary (including =

modifications of static variables, 16 october 2007)


Regards


Simon Riggs wrote:

> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 10:29 +0100, Cyril SCETBON wrote:
>
>   =

>> I think it would be better to be able to modify SLON_DATA_FETCH_SIZE by =

>> using a parameter on the slon command line. For example, we got a lot of =

>> updates (400 per second) between far geographical sites. I had to modify =

>> this variable and to recompile the slon binary cause I didn't find =

>> another way until now.
>>     =

>
> Cyril,
>
> Could you publish your performance results? That will help everybody to
> understand the benefit of this change.
>
> Do you have results for a variety of settings? It may be that we just
> make a permanent change of the #DEFINEd value, rather than making it
> configurable.
>
>   =


-- =

Cyril SCETBON


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: b1_16102007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080117=
/8cdc6e95/b1_16102007-0001.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: b1_25092007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8619 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20080117=
/8cdc6e95/b1_25092007-0001.png