Tue Apr 15 14:33:19 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony shutdowns throwing "Tuple" error
- Next message: [Slony1-general] dual-purpose subscriptions?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, Wondering if anyone has ever attempted this... Is it possible for node B to subscribe table X from node A on set 2 (new set), then turn around and have node B provide table X to nodes C and D on set 1 (existing set)? I suppose it's easier for nodes C and D to subscribe to node A on set 1, but if we could do it the above method, I'd believe there would be less network traffic Thanks for any comments/suggestions! --Richard
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] Slony shutdowns throwing "Tuple" error
- Next message: [Slony1-general] dual-purpose subscriptions?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list