On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:50:41AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 09:44:59PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > On 9/20/07, Decibel! <decibel at decibel.org> wrote:
> > > Seeing the complete duplication of txid.sql between Slony and
> > > londiste bugs me, so I'm hoping we can come up with a replacement
> > > for that in core, and the replica-hooks list seems the logical way
> > > to discuss that...
> > 
> > You forgot to give link to list:
> > 
> >  http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/replica-hooks-discuss
> > 
> > 
> > Compared of to rest of replica-hooks discussion, this is pretty
> > straightforward affair, not much to discuss here.

Actually, what I'm really wondering is if a "commit ID" analogous to a
transaction ID but set at commit time (and in order of commits) would
vastly simplify things...

> > Only question is - Are Slony-I devs interested in common module?
> > And do they want some changes in it?
> 
> What say we ask the rest of the Slony-I people, whom I'm CC'ing here :)

We want to have the discussion across 3 lists? :)
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel at decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.slony.info/pipermail/slony1-general/attachments/20070921/35e8343f/attachment.pgp