Mon Sep 17 13:56:00 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] 4 Problems found with log shipper...
- Next message: [Slony1-general] 4 Problems found with log shipper...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In response to Christopher Browne <cbbrowne at ca.afilias.info>: > 1... The filenames contain the node number, which is > anti-functional... > > slony1_log_2_00000000000000000115.sql slony1_log_3_00000000000000000185.sql By anti-functional, do you mean that it causes confusion when handling the log files after they've been created? I don't think having the node # in the name is bad, I just think that's a bad place for it. I would recommend: slony1_log_00000000000000000115_node_2.sql Which keeps the node information in the name, makes it more apparent what it is, and allows shell tools to sort the files correctly. Good? Bad? Better ideas? -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran at collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
- Previous message: [Slony1-general] 4 Problems found with log shipper...
- Next message: [Slony1-general] 4 Problems found with log shipper...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Slony1-general mailing list